netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: connect to UNIX sockets from specified root

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:11:50 -0400
From:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>,
	Trond.Myklebust@...app.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	xemul@...allels.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: connect to UNIX sockets from specified
 root

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 07:26:28PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On that whole subject...
> > 
> > Do we need a Unix domain socket equivalent to openat()?
> 
> I don't think so. The name is just a file system indexing trick, it's not
> really the socket proper. It's little more than "ascii string with
> permissions attached"

That's overstating the case.  As I understand it the address is resolved
by a pathname lookup like any other--it can follow symlinks, is relative
to the current working directory and filesystem namespace, etc.  So a
unix-domain socket equivalent to openat() would at least be
well-defined--whether it's needed or not, I don't know.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html