[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120810202910.GA19359@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:29:10 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Fedora Kernel Team <kernel-team@...oraproject.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp.c:1598 tcp_recvmsg+0x641/0xd30()
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:46:16AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> We just got an automated report of this WARN being hit in 3.5
>
> > backtrace:
> > :WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp.c:1598 tcp_recvmsg+0x641/0xd30()
> > :Hardware name: P5Q DELUXE
> > :recvmsg bug: copied 99F66400 seq 99F6A4A8 rcvnxt 99F6CDAD fl 0
> > : [<ffffffff811848e6>] do_sync_read+0xe6/0x120
> > : [<ffffffff81275eea>] ? inode_has_perm.isra.31.constprop.61+0x2a/0x30
> > : [<ffffffff81272f32>] ? security_file_permission+0x92/0xb0
> > : [<ffffffff81184d81>] ? rw_verify_area+0x61/0xf0
> > : [<ffffffff811852cd>] vfs_read+0x15d/0x180
> > : [<ffffffff8118533a>] sys_read+0x4a/0x90
> > : [<ffffffff8160fc29>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> 1594 /* Now that we have two receive queues this
> 1595 * shouldn't happen.
> 1596 */
> 1597 if (WARN(before(*seq, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq),
> 1598 "recvmsg bug: copied %X seq %X rcvnxt %X fl %X\n",
> 1599 *seq, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tp->rcv_nxt,
> 1600 flags))
> 1601 break;
>
>
> Hopefully this means more to you guys than it does to me.
We're getting more reports of this happening too.
This guy managed to hit both of the recvmsg BUG's.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846996
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846991
The first reporter claimed to be doing nothing special, just browsing with google chrome.
Anyone ?
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists