[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1344611771.31104.2716.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:16:11 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, lp2s1h@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] codel: refine one condition to avoid a nul rec_inv_sqrt
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 14:54 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 08:52:21 +0200
>
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> >
> > One condition before codel_Newton_step() was not good if
> > we never left the dropping state for a flow. As a result
> > rec_inv_sqrt was 0, instead of the ~0 initial value.
> >
> > codel control law was then set to a very aggressive mode, dropping
> > many packets before reaching 'target' and recovering from this problem.
> >
> > To keep codel_vars_init() as efficient as possible, refine
> > the condition to make sure rec_inv_sqrt initial value is correct
> >
> > Many thanks to Anton Mich for discovering the issue and suggesting
> > a fix.
> >
> > Reported-by: Anton Mich <lp2s1h@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> Applied and queued up for -stable.
Hi David, I think this patch got lost somehow ?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists