netdev - Re: [PATCH V2 09/12] net/eipoib: Add main driver functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5028BBCE.4020908@mellanox.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:33:18 +0300
From:	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<roland@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ali@...lanox.com>,
	<sean.hefty@...el.com>, Erez Shitrit <erezsh@...lanox.co.il>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 09/12] net/eipoib: Add main driver functionality

On 12/08/2012 18:40, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Let me give you a non-hack recomendation.
>
> - Give up on being wire compatible with IPoIB.
>
> - Define and implement ethernet over inifiniband aka EoIB.
>
> With EoIB:
> - The SM would map ethernet address to inifiniband hardware addresses.
> - You discover which multicast addresses are of interest from the
>    IP layer above so no snooping is necessary.
> - You could run queue pairs directly to hosts.
>
> Shrug.  It is trivial and it will work.  It will probably run into the
> same problems that have historically been a problem for using IPoIB
> (lack of stateless offloads) but shrug that is mostly a NIC firmware
> problem.  The switches will have no trouble and interoperability will
> be assured.
>
> If you want to map ethernet over infiniband please map ethernet over
> infiniband.  Don't poorly NAT ethernet into infiniband.
>
>


EoIB is a valid suggestion and we will look into it as well, BUT:

Providing EoIB is a separate discussion, obviously defining and 
standardizing a new protocol takes what is takes (a lot of time, longish 
term effort), and will also take time to develop/debug/mature e.g as you 
mentioned, some of the features/offloads might require new NIC HW, etc 
-- compared to IPoIB which is here for many years

In practice there is already a huge install base for IPoIB software and 
hardware products, in different operating environments/OS. We can't just 
through away everything and tell people to replace it all with a new 
protocol, e.g. bridging devices, storage systems/appliances, VMware, 
Windows, .. systems in production environments --- so
the interoperability concern you've mentioned gonna hit very hard.

The eIPoIB driver comes to provide a way to work with IPoIB in 
virtualized environments, where still, the suggestions/concerns raised 
in this thread should be addressed.

Or.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html