[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <502A51DE.7040809@monom.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:25:50 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] cgroup cls & netprio 'cleanups'
Hi Neil,
On 14.08.2012 15:10, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 03:02:16PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry for the delay on updating this series. The usual
>> excuse apply here.
>>
>> I saw that John is busy improving net_prio so I took the
>> liberty to port his changes to net_cls (#1-3). Patch #3 will
>> collide with John's unapplied patches. I am happy
>> to rebase this series if needed.
>>
>> Patch #4 and #5 improve the readability with using
>> IS_MODULE/BUILTIN macros. This patches prepare the last
>> patch.
>>
>> Patch #6 removes support for assigning subsystem IDs during
>> runtime. As it turns out this is not really needed. By doing
>> so we are able to free some unused memory.
>>
>> The patches are against net-next.
>>
>> cheers,
>> daniel
>>
> These aren't so much 'cleanups' as feature enhancements and fixes for the first
> pass of those enhancements (at least in the case of the net_prio cgroup).
Sorry about that. I wanted to keep the series title, so that someone
looking up older versions find it.
> I've nothing against them, but since we're still going through some churn on the
> net_prio variant, it may be best to wait until thats settled before moving them
> over to net_cls.
Sure, I can update this series when the net_prio controller changes have
settled down.
I just wonder if it wouldn't make sense to merge them together.
Obviously, that will break the user space which is not a good thing but
having a controller per socket option is not good either.
cheers,
daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists