lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:25:50 +0200
From:	Daniel Wagner <>
To:	Neil Horman <>
	Daniel Wagner <>,
	"David S. Miller" <>,
	Al Viro <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	Eric Dumazet <>,
	Gao feng <>,
	Glauber Costa <>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <>,
	John Fastabend <>,
	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <>,
	Li Zefan <>, Tejun Heo <>,
	Tim Chen <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6]  cgroup cls & netprio 'cleanups'

Hi Neil,

On 14.08.2012 15:10, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 03:02:16PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> From: Daniel Wagner <>
>> Hi,
>> Sorry for the delay on updating this series. The usual
>> excuse apply here.
>> I saw that John is busy improving net_prio so I took the
>> liberty to port his changes to net_cls (#1-3). Patch #3 will
>> collide with John's unapplied patches. I am happy
>> to rebase this series if needed.
>> Patch #4 and #5 improve the readability with using
>> IS_MODULE/BUILTIN macros. This patches prepare the last
>> patch.
>> Patch #6 removes support for assigning subsystem IDs during
>> runtime. As it turns out this is not really needed. By doing
>> so we are able to free some unused memory.
>> The patches are against net-next.
>> cheers,
>> daniel
> These aren't so much 'cleanups' as feature enhancements and fixes for the first
> pass of those enhancements (at least in the case of the net_prio cgroup).

Sorry about that. I wanted to keep the series title, so that someone 
looking up older versions find it.

> I've nothing against them, but since we're still going through some churn on the
> net_prio variant, it may be best to wait until thats settled before moving them
> over to net_cls.

Sure, I can update this series when the net_prio controller changes have 
settled down.

I just wonder if it wouldn't make sense to merge them together. 
Obviously, that will break the user space which is not a good thing but 
having a controller per socket option is not good either.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists