[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <502DFABF.3000906@windriver.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:03:11 +0800
From: Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <eric@...it.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1.0] af_packet: don't emit packet on orig fanout
group
David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Leblond <eric@...it.org>
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:44:50 +0200
>
>
>> If a packet is emitted on one socket in one group of fanout sockets,
>> it is transmitted again. It is thus read again on one of the sockets
>> of the fanout group. This result in a loop for software which
>> generate packets when receiving one.
>> This retransmission is not the intended behavior: a fanout group
>> must behave like a single socket. The packet should not be
>> transmitted on a socket if it originates from a socket belonging
>> to the same fanout group.
>>
>> This patch fixes the issue by changing the transmission check to
>> take fanout group info account.
>>
>
> This looks mostly fine, thanks for fixing this.
>
> I wonder if it wouldn't be better to simply have a callback? That
> would eliminate all of the ifdefs:
>
> if (ptype->id_match) {
> if (ptype->id_match(ptype, skb->sk))
> return true;
> } else if (ptype->af_packet_priv == skb->sk)
> return true;
>
> It's a shame that we have a user of af_packet_priv outside of
> AF_PACKET, in TIPC. If we could get rid of that we could simplify
> things even futher.
>
Hi David, next week I will take over the job to get rid the usage of
af_packet_priv from TIPC.
Regards,
Ying
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists