netdev - Re: suspicious RCU usage in xfrm_net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120816.194129.1416562963060076374.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	paul.gortmaker@...driver.com
Cc:	fan.du@...driver.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
	Priyanka.Jain@...escale.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: suspicious RCU usage in xfrm_net_init()

From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:34:25 -0400

> Also, a patch should describe the problem it solves (i.e. the symptom
> the end user sees), and how the problem originated, and why the fix
> in the patch is the _right_ fix.  The worst description a commit log
> can have is one that just describes the C change in words, since
> most people can read C on their own.

I've frankly given up on Fan Du submitting sophisticated patches
that are easy to review and are properly documented.

Just getting simple things like a WORKING EMAIL ADDRESS was beyond a
struggle.

So when I get a patch that applies, from a properly working email
address, it's an accomplishment.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html