[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1208181423050.17600@stinky-local.trash.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:26:29 +0200 (MEST)
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/19] netfilter: nf_conntrack_ipv6: improve fragmentation
handling
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 22:08 +0200, kaber@...sh.net wrote:
>> From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>>
>> The IPv6 conntrack fragmentation currently has a couple of shortcomings.
>> Fragmentes are collected in PREROUTING/OUTPUT, are defragmented, the
>> defragmented packet is then passed to conntrack, the resulting conntrack
>> information is attached to each original fragment and the fragments then
>> continue their way through the stack.
>>
>> Helper invocation occurs in the POSTROUTING hook, at which point only
>> the original fragments are available. The result of this is that
>> fragmented packets are never passed to helpers.
>>
>> This patch improves the situation in the following way:
>>
>> - If a reassembled packet belongs to a connection that has a helper
>> assigned, the reassembled packet is passed through the stack instead
>> of the original fragments.
>
> I'm working on IPv6 fragment handling for IPVS, and are taking advantage
> of the "replay" by nf_ct_frag6_output() at hook prio -399
> (NF_IP6_PRI_CONNTRACK_DEFRAG + 1).
> By making a hook at NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING at prio -99 (NF_IP6_PRI_NAT_DST
> + 1).
>
> I can see that the code path can be changed (with this patch), if a
> helper is assigned. Then the "replay" starts at prio -199
> (NF_IP6_PRI_CONNTRACK + 1), I guess I'm safe as I run at -99.
>
> I have tested that your patchset works, with my ipvs patches, but would
> like the trigger the changed code path, to make sure.
>
> Could you provide an iptables command/rule, that trigger this code path?
The easiest way is a large ping with the NAT patches also applied,
in that case we also pass the first packet of a connection through
the stack reassembled.
>> @@ -199,9 +200,13 @@ static unsigned int ipv6_confirm(unsigned int hooknum,
>> static unsigned int __ipv6_conntrack_in(struct net *net,
>> unsigned int hooknum,
>> struct sk_buff *skb,
>> + const struct net_device *in,
>> + const struct net_device *out,
>> int (*okfn)(struct sk_buff *))
>> {
>> struct sk_buff *reasm = skb->nfct_reasm;
>> + struct nf_conn *ct;
>> + enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
>>
>> /* This packet is fragmented and has reassembled packet. */
>> if (reasm) {
>> @@ -213,6 +218,20 @@ static unsigned int __ipv6_conntrack_in(struct net *net,
>> if (ret != NF_ACCEPT)
>> return ret;
>> }
>> +
>> + /* Conntrack helpers need the entire reassembled packet in the
>> + * POST_ROUTING hook.
>> + */
>> + ct = nf_ct_get(reasm, &ctinfo);
>> + if (ct != NULL && test_bit(IPS_HELPER_BIT, &ct->status)) {
>> + nf_conntrack_get_reasm(skb);
>> + NF_HOOK_THRESH(NFPROTO_IPV6, hooknum, reasm,
>> + (struct net_device *)in,
>> + (struct net_device *)out,
>> + okfn, NF_IP6_PRI_CONNTRACK + 1);
>
> Hook prio change to NF_IP6_PRI_CONNTRACK + 1
I didn't get this part, you want to change to PRE_CONNTRACK + 1? What
about raw and SELinux?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists