[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mdaatbj.b2f3561b17fe4f00a6e947611a0959a1@obelix.schillstrom.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 07:01:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Hans Schillstrom" <hans@...illstrom.com>
To: "Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: "Patrick McHardy" <kaber@...sh.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Julian Anastasov" <ja@....bg>,
"Hans Schillstrom" <hans.schillstrom@...csson.com>
Subject: Re[2]: [PATCH 05/19] netfilter: nf_conntrack_ipv6: improve
fragmentation handling
Hi
>
>On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 21:44 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 14:26 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>[...]
>
>> > Don't I need to load some of the helper modules, or just the
>> > nf_conntrack_ipv6 module, or perhaps only nf_defrag_ipv6 ?
>>
>> Not with the entire patchset, just IPv6 conntrack is enough. Aith IPv6 NAT
>> the first packet of a connection must always be defragemented, independant
>> of an assigned helper.
>
>When loading "nf_conntrack_ipv6" I run into issues.
>
>When sending a fragmented UDP packet. With these patches, the IPVS
>stack will no longer see the fragmented packets, but instead see one
>large SKB. This will trigger a MTU path check in e.g.
>ip_vs_dr_xmit_v6() and an ICMPv6 too big packet is send back.
>
> IPVS: ip_vs_dr_xmit_v6(): frag needed
>
>Perhaps we could change/fix the MTU check in IPVS?
>(This would also solve issues I've seen with TSO/GSO frames, hitting
>this code path).
>
I ran into this as well,
try this for the mtu check.
if ((!skb->local_df && skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) ||
(IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size && IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size > mtu)) {
/Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists