[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06DFBC1E25D8024DB214DC7F41A3CD34488DD0B9@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:27:27 +0000
From: "Vick, Matthew" <matthew.vick@...el.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [net-next 10/13] igb: Tidy up wrapping for CONFIG_IGB_PTP.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcochran@...il.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:29 AM
> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; Vick, Matthew; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> gospo@...hat.com; sassmann@...hat.com
> Subject: Re: [net-next 10/13] igb: Tidy up wrapping for CONFIG_IGB_PTP.
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 02:56:50AM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > From: Matthew Vick <matthew.vick@...el.com>
> >
> > For users without CONFIG_IGB_PTP=y, we should not be compiling any
> PTP
> > code into the driver. Tidy up the wrapping in igb to support this.
>
> I would appreciate being put on Cc: for any PTP stuff.
>
> Also, if you really want to improve the IGB driver, maybe you could
> look at what happens to the time stamping when you do an ifdown/ifup on
> the card. It seems to screw everything (observed on kernel 3.5).
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
Will do going forward. I appreciate the review.
I actually have two patches coming up that bring some further improvements--these first couple patches are foundation for those. In a patch coming up, the ifdown/ifup issue gets resolved.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists