netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH bridge 0/5] Add basic VLAN support to bridges

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50369A99.2070405@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:03:21 +0200
From:	Nicolas de Pesloüan 
	<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>
To:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bridge 0/5] Add basic VLAN support to bridges

Le 23/08/2012 21:29, Vlad Yasevich a écrit :
> This series of patches provides an ability to add VLAN IDs to the bridge
> ports.  This is similar to what can be found in most switches.  The bridge
> port may have any number of VLANs added to it including vlan 0 for untagged
> traffic.  When vlans are added to the port, only traffic tagged with particular
> vlan will forwarded over this port.  Additionally, vlan ids are added to FDB
> entries and become part of the lookup.  This way we correctly identify the FDB
> entry.
>
> There are still pieces missing.  I don't yet support adding a static fdb entry
> with a particular vlan.  There is no netlink support for carrying a vlan id.
>
> I'd like to hear thoughts of whether this is usufull and something we should
> persue.
>

Do you think this might allow for per VLAN spanning tree (having ports in forwarding state or 
blocking state depending on the VLAN) in the future?

	Nicolas.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html