[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120822.215054.1560262447672200871.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: gaofeng@...fujitsu.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, maheshb@...gle.com,
therbert@...gle.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: remove delay at device dismantle
From: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:33:03 +0800
> 于 2012年08月23日 11:19, Eric Dumazet 写道:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>>
>> I noticed extra one second delay in device dismantle, tracked down to
>> a call to dst_dev_event() while some call_rcu() are still in RCU queues.
>>
>> These call_rcu() were posted by rt_free(struct rtable *rt) calls.
>>
>> We then wait a little (but one second) in netdev_wait_allrefs() before
>> kicking again NETDEV_UNREGISTER.
>>
>> As the call_rcu() are now completed, dst_dev_event() can do the needed
>> device swap on busy dst.
>>
>> To solve this problem, add a new NETDEV_UNREGISTER_FINAL, called
>> after a rcu_barrier(), but outside of RTNL lock.
>>
>> Use NETDEV_UNREGISTER_FINAL with care !
>>
>> Change dst_dev_event() handler to react to NETDEV_UNREGISTER_FINAL
>>
>> Also remove NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH, as its not used anymore after
>> IP cache removal.
>>
>> With help from Gao feng
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>> Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
>> Cc: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
>> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>> Cc: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
>
> looks good to me, the lockdep warning message disappeared.
Applied, thanks everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists