netdev - Re: netlink scm creds uid and gids are always 0.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1345795065.5904.2287.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:57:45 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netlink scm creds uid and gids are always 0.

On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 23:45 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> While working on the kuid_t and kgid_t conversion of the audit subsystem
> I noticed that since the performance problem of scm creds and af_unix
> sockets were fixed af_netlink sockets have not filled in the uid or gid
> of the originator of the socket.
> 
> I think all we need is an appropriate cred_to_ucred call to fix this
> regression, but I am going so many different directions right now I
> can't get myself to focus on this long enough to work up an appripriate
> patch to fix.
> 
> Eric do you think you might take a gander?

Wasnt it fixed by e0e3cea46d31d23dc40df0a49a7a2c04fe8edfea

af_netlink: force credentials passing [CVE-2012-3520]

Or is it a different thing ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html