netdev - Re: [net-next 11/13] igb: Update PTP function names/variables and locations.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1345800154.16471.20.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:22:34 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc:	"Vick, Matthew" <matthew.vick@...el.com>,
	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
	"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 11/13] igb: Update PTP function names/variables and
 locations.

On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 08:32 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:02:25PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> 
> > Improving code clarity and consistency isn't churn.
> 
> This patch series moves code around for no good reason. That is, by
> definition, churn.

For your definition of good.

> > The most valuable form of code is the current one,
> > not any antecedent version.
> 
> You really haven't noticed all the code review and rebasing that goes
> on around here in order to improve the commit history, have you?

That'd be incorrect too.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html