[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1345877374.19483.88.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:49:34 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Sylvain Munaut <s.munaut@...tever-company.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: Q: what protects dev->napi_list?
On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 14:08 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 13:29 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 18:39 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah, but bnx2 driver calls it at other time too, for example
> > > bnx2_change_ring_size() which in turn could be called by
> > > bnx2_set_channels().
> >
> > Then at this point, device is stopped, or should be.
> >
>
> But poll_napi() is still iterating the dev->napi_list, could anyone
> stops it?
>
> IOW, the following race condition may happen:
>
> static void poll_napi(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct napi_struct *napi;
> int budget = 16;
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
>
> list_for_each_entry(napi, &dev->napi_list, dev_list) {
> local_irq_enable();
>
> //<-- Another process may call
> //bnx2_change_ring_size() to del
> //napi from dev, on other CPU.
>
> local_irq_disable();
> }
> }
>
>
Are you trying to say netpoll is buggy ?
Thats the first time I ear that !
Just kidding.
I repeat again : If bnx2_change_ring_size() is called while netconsole
is able to enter poll_napi(), then netpoll is buggy and should be fixed.
napi_list is manipulated under a mutex protection, and there is no way
netpoll can use a mutex. Same mutex protection for all other netdevice
management, so even calling start_xmit() should be forbidden in this
state.
Therefore, netpoll must be disabled while a device is reconfigured.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists