netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/19] netfilter: IPv6 NAT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <503B22D3.4020109@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:33:39 +0200
From:	Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To:	Andre Tomt <andre@...t.net>
CC:	kaber@...sh.net, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] netfilter: IPv6 NAT

On 08/25/2012 02:58 AM, Andre Tomt wrote:
> On 09. aug. 2012 22:08, kaber@...sh.net wrote:
>> The following patches contain an updated version of IPv6 NAT against
>> Linus' current tree.
>
> Hmmm. Looking in my crystal ball (hi #ipv6!), I predict that if this
> lands in mainline - and thus in consumer CPE/routers eventually - many
> ISP's will have little incentive to actually implement assigning of
> blocks to their consumer users like they "have to" today.

I think the brokenness of IPv6 ND is still sufficient incentive to 
provide the customer with a prefix.  Whether this prefix is constant 
over an extended period of time is a separate question.  Even among 
consumers, preferences vary widely.

-- 
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html