[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120906.134738.425625608685741613.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:47:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tgraf@...g.ch
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: Export nd_tbl to allow modules to
support IPv6
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 04:51:02 -0400
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:06:36PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> So if one of our goals is to move towards a situation where all neigh
>> accesses are refcount'less, having those external users makes that
>> nearly impossible.
>>
>> Instead, I'd rather see patches that mark arp_tbl as being exported
>> only for internal usage inside of the tree, so that we can reach that
>> goal.
>>
>> I'm not applying this, sorry.
>
> Fair enough
>
> Does that mean you dismiss neighbour lookups by external users in
> general in order to get rid of the refcnt?
>
> Assuming that lookups would still be ok, would an ipv6 version of
> __ipv4_neigh_lookup() be an acceptable API for external users?
> (Yes there is __ipv6_neigh_lookup() already but unlike the ipv4 version
> it takes the table as first argument)
Right now we're in a transition period where ipv4 is mostly refcount'less
and ipv6 is not.
This is part of the reason I don't want to expose these things, the
calling convention and locking requirements are going to be fluid for
any interface you might propose.
arp_tbl was exported only for in-tree users, and I therefore say that
we should only export nd_tbl for in-tree users as well, since that's
the only way we can audit and update all the referencing callers as
the semantics radically change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists