netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] cgroup: Remove CGROUP_BUILTIN_SUBSYS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120906222354.GQ29092@google.com>
Date:	Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:23:54 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] cgroup: Remove CGROUP_BUILTIN_SUBSYS_COUNT

Hello, Daniel.

On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 06:59:25PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> >Wouldn't it be better to explicitly state that a following patch would
> >reduce the SUBSYS_COUNT and stop putting builtin and module ones into
> >different sections?
> 
> Sure, can do that. I just to make sure I understand you correctly,
> What do you mean with different section? Do you refer to the enum sorting?

I meant that there's no reason to have all builtin ones contiguosly
and then the module ones using two cgroup_subsys.h inclusions.

Thanks!

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html