[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1346912779.13121.178.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 08:26:19 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@...advisors.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Increased multicast packet drops in 3.4
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 19:11 -0500, Shawn Bohrer wrote:
> One thing I find interesting is that some of the time 2
> or 3 of the 8 processes will report that they missed the exact same
> 50+ packets. Since the other processes receive the packets I know
> that they are making it to the machine and past the driver.
Could it be that these processes missing 50+ packets provide a non
accessible area of memory and these recvmsg() calls return EFAULT ?
Are you using special memory areas, using mprotect(), or huge pages for
example ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists