[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5049CF77.2060408@6wind.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:41:59 +0200
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4/route: arg delay is useless in rt_cache_flush()
Le 07/09/2012 12:29, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 11:31 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> Since route cache deletion (89aef8921bfbac22f), delay is no
>> more used. Remove it.
>>
> ...
>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
>> @@ -2354,16 +2350,12 @@ static int ipv4_sysctl_rtcache_flush(ctl_table *__ctl, int write,
>> size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
>> {
>> if (write) {
>> - int flush_delay;
>> ctl_table ctl;
>> struct net *net;
>>
>> memcpy(&ctl, __ctl, sizeof(ctl));
>> - ctl.data = &flush_delay;
>> - proc_dointvec(&ctl, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
>> -
>> net = (struct net *)__ctl->extra1;
>> - rt_cache_flush(net, flush_delay);
>> + rt_cache_flush(net);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>
> Why do you keep ctl then ?
>
> if (write) {
> rt_cache_flush((struct net *)__ctl->extra1);
> return 0;
> }
>
>
Right, there is no reason.
Regards,
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists