[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120907.144806.736840770944098543.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:48:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, vyasevich@...il.com, sri@...ibm.com,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check()
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:21:52 +0200
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 17:13 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> Le 07/09/2012 17:09, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
>> > On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 16:47 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> >> Le 07/09/2012 16:35, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
>> >>>
>> >>> Hmm... cant we reuse rt_genid ?
>> >>>
>> >>> (When changing flow_cache_genid, change &net->ipv4.rt_genid)
>> >>
>> >> And so adding a new field in net->ipv6?
>> >
>> > or move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid
>> >
>> > Having separate field for IPv4/IPv6 is of little interest IMHO
>> >
>> Ok, I will wait feedback from other people and repost a patch after.
>
> By the way, the get_random_bytes() calls in rt_cache_invalidate() and in
> rt_genid_init() are no longer needed, since we dont use jhash anymore
> (no more route cache)
I like it, please submit this formally for net-next :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists