netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1347282639.1234.1569.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:10:39 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, vyasevich@...il.com,
	sri@...ibm.com, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check()

On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 14:47 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:

> So it means that IPv6 dst entries will be invalidated by IPv4 route management. 
> For example, calling rt_cache_flush() will flush IPv6 dst too. Is this acceptable?

If it can save another test in fast path, this is acceptable, yes.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html