[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <504DFA97.7070509@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:35:03 -0400
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, sri@...ibm.com,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst
entries
On 09/10/2012 09:22 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> The goal of these patches is to fix the following problem: a session is
> established (TCP, SCTP) and after a new policy is inserted. The current
> code does not recalculate the route, thus the traffic is not encrypted.
>
> The patch propose to check flow_cache_genid value when checking a dst
> entry, which is incremented each time a policy is inserted or deleted.
>
> v2: use net->ipv4.rt_genid instead of flow_cache_genid (and thus save a test
> in fast path). Also move it to net->rt_genid, to be able to use it for IPv6
> too. Note that IPv6 will have one more test in fast path.
>
> Patches are tested with TCP and SCTP, IPv4 and IPv6.
>
> Comments are welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Nicolas
>
I am not sure this is right... This has a side-effect that when an
rt_cache_flush() is called, it invalidates IPv6 routes a well....
Its all fine and good do this when a new policy is added, but not when
IPv4 routing table changes.
-vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists