[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHNqLyXhUo9ny3Wez5kWazaj_bk7mOEqvB8TemkFsu8ZP-ypXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:12:09 -0700
From: Chris Leech <cleech@...hat.com>
To: Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi <bprakash@...adcom.com>
Cc: Robert Love <robert.w.love@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...n-fcoe.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Reorganize libfcoe control interfaces
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi
<bprakash@...adcom.com> wrote:
>
> I'm concerned that we will be breaking user space compatibility with this
> change, as there should be a corresponding fcoemon/fipvlan change along with
> this, and existing utilities will not work. Also the way we start fcoe will
> be completely different and the user may need to do the scripting changes,
> if any.
>
I agree with Bhanu on these concerns, even though I hope everyone's
using fcoeadm/fcoemon/fipvlan. I think there needs to be more of a
transition plan than requiring everyone moving to a new kernel to
update the user-space tools at the same time. Removing the module
parameters with the last patch might be rushed, they should probably
remain for a few kernel cycles with a warning. When the tools are
updated for the new interface, they should probably maintain fallback
support for the module parameters for a while as well.
- Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists