netdev - Re: GRO aggregation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:33:16 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Shlomo Pongartz <shlomop@...lanox.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GRO aggregation

On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 16:45 +0300, Shlomo Pongartz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I’m checking GRO aggregation with kernel 3.6.0-rc1+ using Intel ixgbe 
> driver.
> The mtu is 1500 and GRO is on and so are SG and RX checksum.
> I ran iperf with default setting and monitor the receiver with tcpdump.
> The tcpdump shows that the maximal aggregation is 32120 which is 21 * 1500.
> In the transmitter side tcpdump shows that TSO works better (~64K).
> I did a capture without GRO enabled to see if there was a difference 
> between any flag
> of any two consecutive packets that forced flushing but didn't find 
> anything.
> Is the GRO aggregation can be tuned.

It might mean NAPI runs while about 21 frames can be fetched at once
from NIC.

If receiver cpu is fast enough, it has no need to aggregate more segment
per skb.

Is LRO off or on ?

GRO itself has a 64Kbytes limit.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html