netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] cgroup: Assign subsystem IDs during compile time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120911210821.GB7677@google.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:08:21 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] cgroup: Assign subsystem IDs during compile time

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 02:01:09PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> For example, it's not evident the above is correct and it's burried
> with all other changes.  Can't we just assign the fixed subsys ID to
> net_prio_subsys_id in this patch?  This patch would be correct without
> any netprio changes, no?

Oops, that was wrong.  net_prio_subsys_id itself becomes constant.
Let's please better explain why the RCU trick removal is safe then.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html