[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <504FADC1.4060503@monom.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:31:45 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] cgroup: Assign subsystem IDs during compile time
On 09/11/2012 11:08 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 02:01:09PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> For example, it's not evident the above is correct and it's burried
>> with all other changes. Can't we just assign the fixed subsys ID to
>> net_prio_subsys_id in this patch? This patch would be correct without
>> any netprio changes, no?
>
> Oops, that was wrong. net_prio_subsys_id itself becomes constant.
> Let's please better explain why the RCU trick removal is safe then.
In the last paragraph in the commit message I tried to document why it
is safe to remove the RCU trick. Not good enough?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists