netdev - [PATCH net-next 1/2] ipv6: force RTF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:01:06 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>,
	Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] ipv6: force RTF_NONEXTHOP for SIT device

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

We have special handling of SIT devices in addrconf_prefix_route()
to avoid using a neighbour for each destination.

If routing entry is :

ip -6 route add 2001:db8::/64 dev sit1

Then the kernel will create a new route for every new address
under 2001:db8::/64 that we send a packet to (potentially, 2^64
routes).

Under load, we immediately get the infamous "Neighbour table overflow"
message and machine eventually crash.

This does not happen if we specify a next-hop explicitly, like so:

ip -6 route add 2001:db8::/64 via fe80:: dev sit1

We can avoid this hassle doing the SIT test in ip6_route_add() instead
of addrconf_prefix_route().

This permits ip6_pol_route() to clone route instead of calling
rt6_alloc_cow() and allocate a neighbour

Reported-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
---
 net/ipv6/addrconf.c |   10 ----------
 net/ipv6/route.c    |    9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 1237d5d..c6837d2 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -1679,16 +1679,6 @@ addrconf_prefix_route(struct in6_addr *pfx, int plen, struct net_device *dev,
 	};
 
 	cfg.fc_dst = *pfx;
-
-	/* Prevent useless cloning on PtP SIT.
-	   This thing is done here expecting that the whole
-	   class of non-broadcast devices need not cloning.
-	 */
-#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6_SIT) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_SIT_MODULE)
-	if (dev->type == ARPHRD_SIT && (dev->flags & IFF_POINTOPOINT))
-		cfg.fc_flags |= RTF_NONEXTHOP;
-#endif
-
 	ip6_route_add(&cfg);
 }
 
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 399613b..d4ba3fc 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -1540,6 +1540,15 @@ int ip6_route_add(struct fib6_config *cfg)
 	} else
 		rt->rt6i_prefsrc.plen = 0;
 
+	/* Prevent useless cloning on PtP SIT.
+	 *  This thing is done here expecting that the whole
+	 *  class of non-broadcast devices need not cloning.
+	 */
+#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6_SIT) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_SIT_MODULE)
+	if (dev && dev->type == ARPHRD_SIT && (dev->flags & IFF_POINTOPOINT))
+		cfg->fc_flags |= RTF_NONEXTHOP;
+#endif
+
 	if (cfg->fc_flags & (RTF_GATEWAY | RTF_NONEXTHOP)) {
 		err = rt6_bind_neighbour(rt, dev);
 		if (err)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html