[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120913.161711.2180618409918407558.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:17:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: yuvalmin@...adcom.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dmitry@...adcom.com, eilong@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [net PATCH v2 1/7] bnx2x: Avoid sending multiple statistics
queries
From: "Yuval Mintz" <yuvalmin@...adcom.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:34:08 +0300
> From: Dmitry Kravkov <dmitry@...adcom.com>
>
> During traffic when DCB is enabled, it is possible for multiple instances
> of statistics queries to be sent to the chip - this may cause the FW to assert.
>
> This patch prevents the sending of an additional instance of statistics query
> while the previous query hasn't completed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kravkov <dmitry@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <yuvalmin@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>
This change results in no change in behavior as far as I can tell.
> - if (bnx2x_storm_stats_update(bp) && (bp->stats_pending++ == 3)) {
> - BNX2X_ERR("storm stats were not updated for 3 times\n");
> - bnx2x_panic();
> + if (bnx2x_storm_stats_update(bp)) {
> + if (bp->stats_pending++ == 3) {
> + BNX2X_ERR("storm stats were not updated for 3 times\n");
> + bnx2x_panic();
> + }
There is no difference between:
if (A && B) {
C;
}
and:
if (A) {
if (B) {
C;
}
}
Yet that's exactly what is happening in this patch.
And such a do-nothing change is certainly not appropriate this late in
the -rc series.
I'm tossing this entire series, please sort this out and submit
the real actual critical bug fixes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists