lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120916091747.GA23775@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 16 Sep 2012 12:17:47 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>
Subject: skb_linearize

I notice that dev_hard_start_xmit might invoke
__skb_linearize e.g. if device does not support NETIF_F_SG.

This in turn onvokes __pskb_pull_tail, and
documentation of __pskb_pull_tail says:
  &sk_buff MUST have reference count of 1.

I am guessing 'reference count' means users in this context, right?
IIUC this is because it modifies skb in a way that
isn't safe if anyone else is looking at the skb.


However, I don't see what guarantees that reference
count is 1 when dev_hard_start_xmit invokes
linearize. In particular it calls dev_queue_xmit_nit
which could queue packets on a network tap.

Could someone help me understand please?

Thanks!

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ