lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1347834953.4836.11.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 16 Sep 2012 23:35:53 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: provide a default dev->ethtool_ops

On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 21:17 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> On Sat, 2012-09-15 at 14:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 
> > >  	strcpy(dev->name, name);
> > >  	dev->group = INIT_NETDEV_GROUP;
> > > +	if (!dev->ethtool_ops) {
> > > +		static const struct ethtool_ops default_ethtool_ops;
> > > +
> > > +		dev->ethtool_ops = &default_ethtool_ops;
> > > +	}
> > 
> > This block has a blank line in it, so I think it needs a blank line
> > either side to make the visual grouping of code right.  Alternately you
> > could pull the variable out of the block.
> > 
> 
> Blank line is preferred after a variable declaration in a function.

Yes but:

	when the previous statement is right next to;
	the start of the block {
		the variable declaration is visually grouped with that;

		rather than with the statement that uses it;
	}

> I dont feel the need to make this variable visible outside of this
> function yet. But if you feel it, no problem.
>
> > [...] 
> > > @@ -1410,8 +1409,9 @@ static int ethtool_get_module_eeprom(struct net_device *dev,
> > >  				      modinfo.eeprom_len);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -/* The main entry point in this file.  Called from net/core/dev.c */
> > > -
> > > +/* The main entry point in this file.  Called from net/core/dev.c
> > > + * with RTNL held.
> > > + */
> > 
> > Good point but an unrelated change.
> 
> Its related, because I wanted to make clear (at least for me)
> why assuming dev->ethtool_ops was not NULL at this point was valid.

So we know it won't change under us?  But that is also true of
dev->netdev_ops, which is often used with a finer-grained lock.

> > >  int dev_ethtool(struct net *net, struct ifreq *ifr)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct net_device *dev = __dev_get_by_name(net, ifr->ifr_name);
> > > @@ -1419,25 +1419,15 @@ int dev_ethtool(struct net *net, struct ifreq *ifr)
> > >  	u32 ethcmd;
> > >  	int rc;
> > >  	u32 old_features;
> > > +	const struct ethtool_ops *ops;
> > >  
> > >  	if (!dev || !netif_device_present(dev))
> > >  		return -ENODEV;
> > >  
> > > +	ops = dev->ethtool_ops;
> > [...]
> > 
> > Introducing this local variable is a useful cleanup but again should be
> > a separate change.
> 
> Its a patch meant for net-next, and a cleanup. I could understand your
> point if we had to backport this to stable trees, buts its not the
> case ?
> 
> I really dont care, so if you really prefer I dont cleanup ethtool.c, so
> be it.
>
> Some functions test dev->ethtool_ops is NULL, others lack this test.
> This just makes no sense to me, maybe there is something I missed.

Most of those checks are probably redundant, and I see no problem with
your removing them.  It was just that you were also changing various
other references to dev->ethtool_ops to use local variables.

> Thanks
> 
> [PATCH v2 net-next] net: provide a default dev->ethtool_ops
> 
> Instead of forcing device drivers to provide empty ethtool_ops or tweak
> net/core/ethtool.c again, we could provide a generic ethtool_ops.
> 
> This occurred to me when I wanted to add GSO support to GRE tunnels.
> ethtool -k support should be generic for all drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> Cc: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>

> ---
>  net/core/dev.c     |    4 ++++
>  net/core/ethtool.c |   12 ------------
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index dcc673d..2bcb02c 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -5959,6 +5959,8 @@ struct netdev_queue *dev_ingress_queue_create(struct net_device *dev)
>  	return queue;
>  }
>  
> +static const struct ethtool_ops default_ethtool_ops;
> +
>  /**
>   *	alloc_netdev_mqs - allocate network device
>   *	@sizeof_priv:	size of private data to allocate space for
> @@ -6046,6 +6048,8 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mqs(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
>  
>  	strcpy(dev->name, name);
>  	dev->group = INIT_NETDEV_GROUP;
> +	if (!dev->ethtool_ops)
> +		dev->ethtool_ops = &default_ethtool_ops;
>  	return dev;
>  
>  free_all:
> diff --git a/net/core/ethtool.c b/net/core/ethtool.c
> index cbf033d..4d64cc2 100644
> --- a/net/core/ethtool.c
> +++ b/net/core/ethtool.c
> @@ -1426,18 +1426,6 @@ int dev_ethtool(struct net *net, struct ifreq *ifr)
>  	if (copy_from_user(&ethcmd, useraddr, sizeof(ethcmd)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  
> -	if (!dev->ethtool_ops) {
> -		/* A few commands do not require any driver support,
> -		 * are unprivileged, and do not change anything, so we
> -		 * can take a shortcut to them. */
> -		if (ethcmd == ETHTOOL_GDRVINFO)
> -			return ethtool_get_drvinfo(dev, useraddr);
> -		else if (ethcmd == ETHTOOL_GET_TS_INFO)
> -			return ethtool_get_ts_info(dev, useraddr);
> -		else
> -			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -	}
> -
>  	/* Allow some commands to be done by anyone */
>  	switch (ethcmd) {
>  	case ETHTOOL_GSET:
> 
> 

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ