[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120919144557.16956.11280.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:46:06 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] tcp: use of undefined variable
From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Both tcp_timewait_state_process and tcp_check_req use the same basic
construct of
struct tcp_options received tmp_opt;
tmp_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
then call
tcp_parse_options
However if they are fed a frame containing a TCP_SACK then tbe code
behaviour is undefined because opt_rx->sack_ok is undefined data.
This ought to be documented if it is intentional.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
index e965319..a4ace80 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ static bool tcp_in_window(u32 seq, u32 end_seq, u32 s_win, u32 e_win)
* spinlock it. I do not want! Well, probability of misbehaviour
* is ridiculously low and, seems, we could use some mb() tricks
* to avoid misread sequence numbers, states etc. --ANK
+ *
+ * We don't need to initialize tmp_out.sack_ok as we don't use the results
*/
enum tcp_tw_status
tcp_timewait_state_process(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, struct sk_buff *skb,
@@ -96,6 +98,7 @@ tcp_timewait_state_process(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, struct sk_buff *skb,
bool paws_reject = false;
tmp_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
+
if (th->doff > (sizeof(*th) >> 2) && tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp) {
tcp_parse_options(skb, &tmp_opt, &hash_location, 0, NULL);
@@ -522,6 +525,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_create_openreq_child);
*
* XXX (TFO) - The current impl contains a special check for ack
* validation and inside tcp_v4_reqsk_send_ack(). Can we do better?
+ *
+ * We don't need to initialize tmp_opt.sack_ok as we don't use the results
*/
struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists