[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1348119475.31352.60.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:37:55 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] tcp: use order-3 pages in tcp_sendmsg()
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 15:20 -0700, Vijay Subramanian wrote:
> > I did some tests and got no problem so far, even using splice() [ this
> > one was tricky because it only deals with order-0 pages at this moment ]
> >
> > NIC tested : ixgbe, igb, bnx2x, tg3, mellanox mlx4
>
>
> I applied this patch to net-next and tested with e1000e driver.
> With iperf I got around 8 % improvement on loopback.
>
> Tested-by: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>
>
>
> Vijay
If you keep the producer and consumer on separate cpus, and use large
enough send() (64KB or 128KB), gain is more like 15 or 20%
iperf uses 8KB writes, while netperf uses a 16KB default.
TCP stack has a problem because /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_reordering
default value (3) is too small for loopback, since a packet contains 4
MSS
A single reorder and some packets are retransmitted.
Following setting is better
echo 16 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_reordering
loopback is lossless, so its always surprising we can have TCP
retransmits on this medium ;)
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists