[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120921184035.GF6129@netboy.at.omicron.at>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:40:35 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
"Vick, Matthew" <matthew.vick@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] ptp: derive the device name from the
parent device
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:23:03PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> I think what I'm still missing from you is some explanation of what the
> 'clock name' is meant to be used as - a type name, a unique identifier,
> a 'friendly name' for listing clocks in a user interface?
The original idea was a type/friendly kind of thing.
Imagine you are the admin of some random box that should run PTP. You
do 'cat /sys/class/ptp/ptp0/clock_name' and see "gianfar clock". Then
you think to yourself, "Excellent, I know that one, it works great,
and I can even get a PPS output."
But if you saw "IXP46X timer" then you would think, "Forget it, this
will never work."
That was the idea.
But before the ethtool thing came along, people started putting MAC
addresses in that string, and it continued even after the ethtool
method appeared. I wanted to correct the MAC abuses, but then I
thought you were concurring with putting some kind of semi-unique
device ID there.
I really don't care too much about the clock_name anyhow, because I
always know my own hardware. I don't mind changing it from type-string
or friendly-name to device ID, if people think that is more useful.
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists