netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/3 V2] phy/micrel: Implement support for KSZ8021

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120921.145405.646315503417542108.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:54:05 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	marex@...x.de
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, david.choi@...rel.com,
	nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@...esas.com, fabio.estevam@...escale.com,
	shawn.guo@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 V2] phy/micrel: Implement support for KSZ8021

From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:50:46 +0200

> Dear David Miller,
> 
>> From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
>> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:33:12 +0200
>> 
>> > I don't like it.
>> 
>> Then I'm not applying your patches.
> 
> What about the other part of my offer ?

I read it, and if it were relevant to this discussion I would
have quoted it.

Can you please just fix up your patches exactly how I have asked you
to so that I can get these bug fixes into the 'net' tree?

This is completely rediculous, nobody else pushes back when I make
simple coding style correction requests for their changes like you
are.

You're behavior is self defeating, it's causing your work to not be
useful and to not propagate to the very place where people can benefit
from it the most.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html