netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] be2net: Ignore spurious UE indication from NIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120921.150413.2303624982785706643.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:04:13 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ajit.khaparde@...lex.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] be2net: Ignore spurious UE indication from NIC

From: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@...lex.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:36:20 -0500

> Ignore spurious UE indication seen on some platforms.
> Consider the error as un-recoverable only when the bits
> stay high during second sampling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@...lex.com>

Treating uncorrectable errors as spurious seems like an invitation
for hard to track down data corruption to me.

You'll need to come up with a more sophisticated test for
spurious other than "happens more than once" before I'm willing
to subject the entire world to this kind of potential problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html