netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] usbnet: support runtime PM triggered by link change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACVXFVO6BuboVV5y5PBCZORNBNQuDzovCQL6tMrxxM+ehymDAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:44:49 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	oliver@...kum.org, bjorn@...k.no, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	finik@...com, rjw@...k.pl, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] usbnet: support runtime PM triggered by link change

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:16 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:04:38 +0200
>
>> On Thursday 20 September 2012 17:02:27 David Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> There seems to be some discussion about the legitimacy of doing things
>>> this way, and in any event the patches were an RFC.
>>>
>>> Please resubmit as a non-RFC once all the issues have been worked
>>> out, if appropriate.
>>
>> Just to make this clear, I'd like to state that the discussion involved
>> only the third, last patch in the series. The first two are fine and make
>> sense by themselves.
>
> I want changes in those, see my replies.

No problem, I will send out -v2 of the first two patches later.

thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html