netdev - [PATCH net-next 3/4] tcp: TCP Fast Open Server - note timestamps and retransmits for SYNACK RTT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1348323537-30310-3-git-send-email-ncardwell@google.com>
Date:	Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:18:56 -0400
From:	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
	Jerry Chu <hkchu@...gle.com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/4] tcp: TCP Fast Open Server - note timestamps and retransmits for SYNACK RTT

Previously, when using TCP Fast Open a server would return from
tcp_check_req() before updating snt_synack based on TCP timestamp echo
replies and whether or not we've retransmitted the SYNACK. The result
was that (a) for TFO connections using timestamps we used an incorrect
baseline SYNACK send time (tcp_time_stamp of SYNACK send instead of
rcv_tsecr), and (b) for TFO connections that do not have TCP
timestamps but retransmit the SYNACK we took a SYNACK RTT sample when
we should not take a sample.

This fix merely moves the snt_synack update logic a bit earlier in the
function, so that connections using TCP Fast Open will properly do
these updates when the ACK for the SYNACK arrives.

Moving this snt_synack update logic means that with TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT
enabled we do a few instructions of wasted work on each bare ACK, but
that seems OK.

Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c |   10 ++++++----
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
index 5792577..27536ba 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
@@ -692,6 +692,12 @@ struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (!(flg & TCP_FLAG_ACK))
 		return NULL;

+	/* Got ACK for our SYNACK, so update baseline for SYNACK RTT sample. */
+	if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp && tmp_opt.rcv_tsecr)
+		tcp_rsk(req)->snt_synack = tmp_opt.rcv_tsecr;
+	else if (req->retrans) /* don't take RTT sample if retrans && ~TS */
+		tcp_rsk(req)->snt_synack = 0;
+
 	/* For Fast Open no more processing is needed (sk is the
 	 * child socket).
 	 */
@@ -705,10 +711,6 @@ struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPDEFERACCEPTDROP);
 		return NULL;
 	}
-	if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp && tmp_opt.rcv_tsecr)
-		tcp_rsk(req)->snt_synack = tmp_opt.rcv_tsecr;
-	else if (req->retrans) /* don't take RTT sample if retrans && ~TS */
-		tcp_rsk(req)->snt_synack = 0;

 	/* OK, ACK is valid, create big socket and
 	 * feed this segment to it. It will repeat all
-- 
1.7.7.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html