lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:43:57 +0200
From:	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
To:	sony.chacko@...gic.com
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, agospoda@...hat.com,
	rajesh.borundia@...gic.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netxen: write IP address to firmware when using
 bonding

On 25/09/12 10:48, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov<naleksan@...hat.com>
>
> This patch allows LRO aggregation on bonded devices that contain an NX3031
> device. It also adds a for_each_netdev_in_bond_rcu(bond, slave) macro
> which executes for each slave that has bond as master.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Gospodarek<agospoda@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov<nikolay@...hat.com>
> ---
>   .../net/ethernet/qlogic/netxen/netxen_nic_main.c   | 113 +++++++++++++++------
>   include/linux/netdevice.h                          |   3 +
>   2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/netxen/netxen_nic_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/netxen/netxen_nic_main.c
> index e2a4858..aaf6cf7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/netxen/netxen_nic_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/netxen/netxen_nic_main.c
> @@ -3244,6 +3244,25 @@ netxen_restore_indev_addr(struct net_device *netdev, unsigned long event)
>   	}
>   }
>
> +static inline int
> +netxen_config_checkdev(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct netxen_adapter *adapter;
> +
> +	if (!is_netxen_netdev(dev))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	
> +	adapter = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +	if(!adapter)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (adapter->is_up != NETXEN_ADAPTER_UP_MAGIC)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static int netxen_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this,
>   				 unsigned long event, void *ptr)
>   {
> @@ -3260,18 +3279,27 @@ recheck:
>   		goto recheck;
>   	}
>
> -	if (!is_netxen_netdev(dev))
> -		goto done;
> -
> -	adapter = netdev_priv(dev);
> -
> -	if (!adapter)
> -		goto done;
> +	/* If this is a bonding device, look for netxen-based slaves*/
> +	if (dev->priv_flags&  IFF_BONDING) {
> +		struct net_device *slave;
>
> -	if (adapter->is_up != NETXEN_ADAPTER_UP_MAGIC)
> -		goto done;
> +		rcu_read_lock();
> +		for_each_netdev_in_bond_rcu(dev, slave) {
> +			if (netxen_config_checkdev(slave)<  0)
> +				continue;
> +			
> +			adapter = netdev_priv(slave);
> +			netxen_config_indev_addr(adapter, orig_dev, event);
> +		}
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
>
> -	netxen_config_indev_addr(adapter, orig_dev, event);
> +	} else {
> +		if (netxen_config_checkdev(dev)<  0)
> +			goto done;
> +		
> +		adapter = netdev_priv(dev);
> +		netxen_config_indev_addr(adapter, orig_dev, event);
> +	}
>   done:
>   	return NOTIFY_DONE;
>   }
> @@ -3296,30 +3324,57 @@ recheck:
>   		goto recheck;
>   	}
>
> -	if (!is_netxen_netdev(dev))
> -		goto done;
> +	/* If this is a bonding device, look for netxen-based slaves*/
> +	if (dev->priv_flags&  IFF_BONDING) {
> +		struct net_device *slave;
>
> -	adapter = netdev_priv(dev);
> +		rcu_read_lock();
> +		for_each_netdev_in_bond_rcu(dev, slave) {
> +			if (netxen_config_checkdev(slave)<  0)
> +				continue;
>
> -	if (!adapter || !netxen_destip_supported(adapter))
> -		goto done;
> +			adapter = netdev_priv(slave);
>
> -	if (adapter->is_up != NETXEN_ADAPTER_UP_MAGIC)
> -		goto done;
> +			if (!netxen_destip_supported(adapter))
> +				continue;
>
> -	switch (event) {
> -	case NETDEV_UP:
> -		netxen_config_ipaddr(adapter, ifa->ifa_address, NX_IP_UP);
> -		netxen_list_config_vlan_ip(adapter, ifa, NX_IP_UP);
> -		break;
> -	case NETDEV_DOWN:
> -		netxen_config_ipaddr(adapter, ifa->ifa_address, NX_IP_DOWN);
> -		netxen_list_config_vlan_ip(adapter, ifa, NX_IP_DOWN);
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		break;
> -	}
> +			switch (event) {
> +			case NETDEV_UP:
> +				netxen_config_ipaddr(adapter, ifa->ifa_address, NX_IP_UP);
> +				netxen_list_config_vlan_ip(adapter, ifa, NX_IP_UP);
> +				break;
> +			case NETDEV_DOWN:
> +				netxen_config_ipaddr(adapter, ifa->ifa_address, NX_IP_DOWN);
> +				netxen_list_config_vlan_ip(adapter, ifa, NX_IP_DOWN);
> +				break;
> +			default:
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
>
> +	} else {
> +		if (netxen_config_checkdev(dev)<  0)
> +			goto done;
> +
> +		adapter = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +		if (!netxen_destip_supported(adapter))
> +			goto done;
> +
> +		switch (event) {
> +		case NETDEV_UP:
> +			netxen_config_ipaddr(adapter, ifa->ifa_address, NX_IP_UP);
> +			netxen_list_config_vlan_ip(adapter, ifa, NX_IP_UP);
> +			break;
> +		case NETDEV_DOWN:
> +			netxen_config_ipaddr(adapter, ifa->ifa_address, NX_IP_DOWN);
> +			netxen_list_config_vlan_ip(adapter, ifa, NX_IP_DOWN);
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
>   done:
>   	return NOTIFY_DONE;
>   }
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 59dc05f3..463bb40 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -1578,6 +1578,9 @@ extern rwlock_t				dev_base_lock;		/* Device list lock */
>   		list_for_each_entry_continue(d,&(net)->dev_base_head, dev_list)
>   #define for_each_netdev_continue_rcu(net, d)		\
>   	list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(d,&(net)->dev_base_head, dev_list)
> +#define for_each_netdev_in_bond_rcu(bond, slave)	\
> +	for_each_netdev_rcu(&init_net, slave)		\
> +		if (slave->master == bond)
>   #define net_device_entry(lh)	list_entry(lh, struct net_device, dev_list)
>
>   static inline struct net_device *next_net_device(struct net_device *dev)
Ah yes, you're correct. I'll fix the cosmetic issues and re-post it.
I would like to know if the patch is acceptable otherwise, and if
there are any comments about the implementation so I will
wait a little bit to see if anything else comes up.
Thank you for the review.

Best regards,
  Nikolay Aleksandrov

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ