[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120926054945.GE4221@secunet.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 07:49:45 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, pablo@...filter.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, jengelh@...i.de,
stephen.hemminger@...tta.com,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] crypto: pass crypto_user module to
netlink_dump_start
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:52:17PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> use proper netlink_dump_control.done and .module to avoid panic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> ---
> crypto/crypto_user.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/crypto/crypto_user.c b/crypto/crypto_user.c
> index ba2c611..b5cb32b 100644
> --- a/crypto/crypto_user.c
> +++ b/crypto/crypto_user.c
> @@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ out_err:
>
> static int crypto_dump_report_done(struct netlink_callback *cb)
> {
> + netlink_dump_done(cb);
> return 0;
It's probaply better to return the return value of netlink_dump_done()
instead. Right now, netlink_dump_done() returns 0 in any case,
but this might change over time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists