[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50632F06.1040306@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:36:22 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: use bigger pages in __netdev_alloc_frag
On 09/26/2012 09:14 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 09:00 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
>> One minor thought. Instead of tracking offset and size why not just
>> work from the top down instead of the bottom up?
>>
>> So instead of starting with the frag offset at 0, why not start it at
>> PAGE_SIZE << order, and then work your way down to 0. That way you
>> don't need to track both size and offset.
>>
> How do you refill then ?
>
> (ie setting xxx->offset back to PAGE_SIZE << order)
>
> I am not sure we have direct access to a page order given a struct page
> pointer.
>
> I also like struct page_frag abstraction, because it might allow us
> better code factorization with other frag allocators.
>
> ( skb_append_datato_frags(), sk_page_frag_refill(), ...)
I forgot about the page recycling portion of it. I was still thinking
of the original implementation that had a fixed page order. You are
correct, with the page order being dynamic you will have to store size
somewhere.
Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists