[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5064869E.9060503@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:02:22 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
CC: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] tcp: introduce tcp_tw_interval to specifiy
the time of TIME-WAIT
On 09/27/2012 07:23 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> The code looks fine, but the idea really doesn't seem like a good plan to me.
> I'm sure HPUX/Solaris/AIX/etc have done this in response to customer demand, but
> that doesn't make it the right solution.
In the case of HP-UX at least, while the rope is indeed there, the
advice is to not wrap it around one's neck unless one *really* has a
handle on the environment. Instead things suggested, in no particular
order:
*) The aforementioned SO_REUSEADDR to address the "I can't restart the
server quickly enough." issue
*) Tuning the size of the anonymous/ephemeral port range.
*) Making explicit bind() calls using the entire non-privileged port range
*) Making the connections longer-lived. Especially if the comms are
between a fixed set of IP addresses.
rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists