lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5E4F49720D0BAD499EE1F01232234BA877447F451C@AVEXMB1.qlogic.org> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:13:49 -0700 From: Jitendra Kalsaria <jitendra.kalsaria@...gic.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, "Narendra_K@...l.com" <Narendra_K@...l.com> CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Sony Chacko <sony.chacko@...gic.com>, "john.r.fastabend@...el.com" <john.r.fastabend@...el.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH] qlcnic - Fix scheduling while atomic bug -----Original Message----- >From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of David Miller >Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 3:22 PM >To: Narendra_K@...l.com >Cc: netdev; Sony Chacko; Jitendra Kalsaria; john.r.fastabend@...el.com >Subject: Re: [PATCH] qlcnic - Fix scheduling while atomic bug > > >Is it really the case that not one Qlogic person feels like ACK'ing >this patch that fixes an obvious bug in their driver for 2 full days? > >For real? Definitely it fixes an obvious bug and also an good patch but it took little longer to test it before I ack back. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists