netdev - Re: Possible networking regression in 3.6.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1348831592.5093.2251.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:26:32 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Chris Clayton <chris2553@...glemail.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	gpiez@....de
Subject: Re: Possible networking regression in 3.6.0

On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 10:22 +0100, Chris Clayton wrote:

> No, the WinXP guest is configured with a fixed IP address 
> (192.168.200.1). Subnet mask is 255.255.255.0, and default gateway is 
> 192.168.200.254. DNS is 192.168.0.1.
> 

I have no problem with such a setup, with a linux guest.

Could you send again a tcpdump, but including link-level header ?
(option -e)

Ideally, you could send two traces, one taken on tap0, and another taken
on eth0.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html