[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2565578.vyFL3Bzlf9@bureau>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:49:30 +0000
From: Nolwenn <donolwenn@...il.com>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc: hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug with r8169 driver
Le samedi 29 septembre 2012 09:20:28 Francois Romieu a écrit :
> > > Can you send an 'ip -s link' before any ipv6 traffic flows, then
> > > after ?
> >
> > Before ipv6 traffic
> >
> > % ip -s link
>
> /me plugs brain and realizes that the driver does not update the device
> stats multicast field.
>
> The multicast stats will appear in the output of 'ethtool -S eth0'.
>
> Can you send two complete binary tcpdump captures (w/o -p option) in the
> same contexts ?
>
Before tcpdump and some mail checking
# ethtool -S eth0
NIC statistics:
tx_packets: 3309
rx_packets: 4672
tx_errors: 0
rx_errors: 0
rx_missed: 0
align_errors: 0
tx_single_collisions: 0
tx_multi_collisions: 0
unicast: 4672
broadcast: 0
multicast: 0
tx_aborted: 0
tx_underrun: 0
After tcpdump wihout mail checking
# ethtool -S eth0
NIC statistics:
tx_packets: 302
rx_packets: 491
tx_errors: 0
rx_errors: 0
rx_missed: 0
align_errors: 0
tx_single_collisions: 0
tx_multi_collisions: 0
unicast: 299
broadcast: 82
multicast: 110
tx_aborted: 0
tx_underrun: 0
The two dumps are attached (I hope it's what Michel wants !)
tcpdump -pw dump-eth0-promisc-off
tcpdump -w dump-eth0-promisc-on
Download attachment "dump-eth0-promisc-off" of type "application/vnd.tcpdump.pcap" (19747 bytes)
Download attachment "dump-eth0-promisc-on" of type "application/vnd.tcpdump.pcap" (72227 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists