[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121001.165527.1025640918619977740.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:55:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ipv6: don't add link local route when there is no
link local address
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:09:22 +0200
> When an address is added on loopback (ip -6 a a 2002::1/128 dev lo), a route
> to fe80::/64 is added in the main table:
> unreachable fe80::/64 dev lo proto kernel metric 256 error -101
>
> This route does not match any prefix (no fe80:: address on lo). In fact,
> addrconf_dev_config() will not add link local address because this function
> filters interfaces by type. If the link local address is added manually, the
> route to the link local prefix will be automatically added by
> addrconf_add_linklocal().
> Note also, that this route is not deleted when the address is removed.
>
> After looking at the code, it seems that addrconf_add_lroute() is redundant with
> addrconf_add_linklocal(), because this function will add the link local route
> when the link local address is configured.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
This change looks correct, however:
> @@ -2489,7 +2479,6 @@ static void addrconf_sit_config(struct net_device *dev)
>
> if (dev->flags&IFF_POINTOPOINT) {
> addrconf_add_mroute(dev);
> - addrconf_add_lroute(dev);
> } else
> sit_route_add(dev);
now that the if() branch is a single statement, please remove the
curly braces.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists