[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121002.231037.581571797430134988.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 23:10:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ja@....bg
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, chris2553@...glemail.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gpiez@....de, davej@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Possible networking regression in 3.6.0
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 02:24:53 +0300 (EEST)
> Can it be a problem related to fib_info reuse
> from different routes. For example, when local IP address
> is created for subnet we have:
>
> broadcast 192.168.0.255 dev DEV proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1
> 192.168.0.0/24 dev DEV proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1
> local 192.168.0.1 dev DEV proto kernel scope host src 192.168.0.1
>
> The "dev DEV proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1" is
> a reused fib_info structure where we put cached routes.
> The result can be same fib_info for 192.168.0.255 and
> 192.168.0.0/24. RTN_BROADCAST is cached only for input
> routes. Incoming broadcast to 192.168.0.255 can be cached
> and can cause problems for traffic forwarded to 192.168.0.0/24.
> So, this patch should solve the problem because it
> separates the broadcast from unicast traffic.
Now I understand the problem.
I think the way to fix this is to add cfg->fc_type as another
thing that fib_info objects are key'd by.
I think it also would fix your obscure output multicast case too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists