netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/5] ucc_geth: Increase RX ring buffer from 32 to 64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 03 Oct 2012 15:38:55 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ucc_geth: Increase RX ring buffer from 32 to 64

From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:17:58 +0200

> Ping? Got no comments and I can see it in net or net-next trees either.

No patch will be applied to the tree when one of the indiviual patches
get feedback and request changes from you.

When an individual patch must be redone, you must resend the entire
series not just the individual patch which changed.

You also never need to ask the kind of question you are asking here,
you simply need to look into patch work to see what the state of
your patches is:

I maintain this state exactly so people don't need to waste precious
developer time asking "what is the state of my patch" like you are
making me do right here.

See:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?state=*&q=ucc_geth

And as you can see this entire series is marked as either "RFC"
or "Changes Requested"

Even worse, you did this for not one but several of the patches you
posted.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html