netdev - Re: [PATCH] udp: port starting location not random

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 04 Oct 2012 17:12:46 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	shemminger@...tta.com
Cc:	dada1@...mosbay.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udp: port starting location not random

From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:08:28 -0700

> While working on VXLAN, noticed a bug in UDP introduced by:
> 
> commit 9088c5609584684149f3fb5b065aa7f18dcb03ff
> Author: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
> Date:   Wed Oct 8 11:44:17 2008 -0700
> 
>     udp: Improve port randomization
>     
> 
> The logic for choosing where to start for port randomization incorrectly
> calculates the starting port number. It is always ends up using
> the low end of the range independent of the value of random.
> This causes all UDP port searches to start at the same port.
> 
> Doing the following fixes it but at the cost of doing a real divide.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
> 
> ---
> Resend, previous send was not going to netdev.
> 
> Not sure if worth fixing for stable, because only has performance impact
> and some application might be depending on current broken behaviour.
> 
> 
> 
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c	2012-10-01 17:06:53.107427436 -0700
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c	2012-10-04 13:43:21.278960379 -0700
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ int udp_lib_get_port(struct sock *sk, un
>  		remaining = (high - low) + 1;
>  
>  		rand = net_random();
> -		first = (((u64)rand * remaining) >> 32) + low;
> +		first = rand % remaining + low;

Try replacing "remaining" with "(remaining << (64 - 16))" in
the expression instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html