[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ipaq1jtt.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:21:42 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Thomas Lendacky <tahm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, avi@...hat.com,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio-net: inline header support
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes:
> Il 04/10/2012 02:11, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
>> > > There's a reason I haven't done this. I really, really dislike "my
>> > > implemention isn't broken" feature bits. We could have an infinite
>> > > number of them, for each bug in each device.
>> >
>> > However, this bug affects (almost) all implementations and (almost) all
>> > devices. It even makes sense to reserve a transport feature bit for it
>> > instead of a device feature bit.
>>
>> Perhaps, but we have to fix the bugs first!
>
> Yes. :) Isn't that what mst's patch does?
>
>> As I said, my torture patch broke qemu immediately. Since noone has
>> leapt onto fixing that, I'll take a look now...
>
> I can look at virtio-scsi.
Actually, you can't, see my reply to Anthony...
Message-ID: <87lifm1y1n.fsf@...tcorp.com.au>
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists